This letter was originally published for Fundrise investors on 7/1/2020.

First Half 2020 performance

Don’t have time to read? Listen to an audio recording of this update instead →

Key takeaways

  • The Fundrise net platform return for the first six months of 2020 was approximately +2.41%1 in comparison to -4.91%2 for stocks (VTI) and -15.00%2 for public REITs (VNQ).
  • This top-line performance is supported by strong fundamentals, with a number of our stabilized properties actually experiencing positive rent growth in spite of the larger economic contraction.
  • We attribute this success primarily to having maintained a disciplined value investment approach, led by our most active strategy of owning and lending to affordable apartment communities in growing cities throughout the Sunbelt.
  • While we believe there is still the potential for hard times ahead, because of the stability exhibited by the broader portfolio over the last six months, we have chosen to resume normal operations of the redemption programs and expect to ramp up new acquisitions through the rest of the year as opportunities present themselves.

Although we’ve traditionally reserved this kind of in-depth analysis for our year-end review, given the nature of the times, we felt that it was both appropriate and important to share a detailed look at the overall performance of the portfolio through the first half of 2020.

Real estate is (as we like to reiterate) a long-term investment that should be measured in years…not months or days. Though, in certain very rare instances, years or even decades worth of change can seem to occur in a matter of weeks.

Stability in the face of unprecedented volatility

After a start to the year that saw the stock market continuously setting new all-time highs, “normal” life, as we all knew it, came to a crashing halt as the COVID-19 pandemic unleashed a once-in-a-century global health crisis along with the largest and most rapid economic downturn since the Great Depression. Today, in the US alone, more than 125,000 individuals have already lost their lives to the virus, while approximately 30 million more have lost their jobs. Businesses large and small are struggling to figure out how to survive in an environment where the basic paradigms of consumer behavior are for the moment effectively paused with the very real potential that some of these seemingly “temporary” trends will become permanent. At the same time, the country is also experiencing a once-in-a-generation social movement, where many Americans are calling into question the true values upon which our civil society (and our economy) are built, as they demand greater racial justice and equality.

It is within the context of these pivotal world events that we then take measure of our investment performance over the last six months and continue to be encouraged by the strength and stability of the overall portfolio, particularly in comparison to what can only be described as extreme volatility in nearly every other investment class. While it is by no means a surprise to us that the assets overall have maintained their integrity — the stress test we shared in early April outlined the high degree of confidence that we had in being able to withstand a severe economic contraction — there is still nothing more reassuring than seeing actual performance in the face of such unprecedented headwinds.

In short, over the first six months of the year, Fundrise net platform returns have averaged approximately +2.41% in comparison to -4.91% for stocks, as measured by the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and -15.00% for public REITs, as measured by the Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ).

However, this single measure of performance alone is arguably insufficient in understanding the truly differentiated nature of our returns during this time period. Since the onset of the coronavirus in the US, public stocks have experienced one of their most volatile periods in history, with the Dow plunging 37% from February 12 to March 25, then recovering 48% to its most recent peak on June 8 — to now being down for the year -9.8%. Meanwhile, Fundrise net platform returns were up approximately 1.15% for the first quarter and approximately 1.26% for the second quarter. During the first half of the year, we paid out an average dividend equivalent to a 3.63% annualized yield. Note that this is not necessarily representative of any one individual investor’s account, which is likely to vary depending on a variety of factors, including primary investment objective (i.e. income vs. growth) and age of the investments.

The public market liquidity crisis

Investors are always told not to react to sharp swings in the market, but as human beings, we have evolved a strong urge to cut our losses and run when the odds seem insurmountable. This survival mechanism usually serves us well, but when it comes to keeping one’s finger off the “sell” button in the face of double-digit losses, it’s often easier said than done. Perhaps it’s unsurprising, then, that the market saw record outflows from both stocks and bonds during March, as investors fled for the safety of cash and government treasuries. The downside of course being that those investors who did sell off a substantial portion of their portfolios likely wiped out several years’ worth of gains, only to then miss the subsequent record-breaking comeback.

Liquidity is, of course, valuable when there’s a genuine need for it (e.g., to buy a home or to retire), but when emotions are running high, it can be a dangerous temptation that leads to painful losses.

In contrast to publicly traded stocks or ETFs, the inherent illiquidity of private real estate investments — with a far more limited pool of buyers and a due diligence process that typically takes weeks if not months before a transaction occurs — can act as an effective shield against the value destruction caused by panic selling.

It’s apparent that at the end of March, when the US was scarcely one month into the crisis, and the facts (though alarming) were still very much unknown, selling a commercial building at the 35 – 40% discount needed to find a buyer would have been a poorly informed and unwise investment decision. Yet in the public markets, many investors did precisely that, effectively forcing the sale of the underlying assets in which they were invested at eye-watering losses.

Driven by the innate human desire to take action, however inadvisable, this behavior occurred across markets in March as investors dumped stocks, mutual funds, and ETFs of all kinds, creating a liquidity crisis that affected even those assets that would typically be considered the safest, such as US treasuries.

Ultimately, were it not for the Federal Reserve taking the extraordinary step to drop interest rates to 0% on the evening of Sunday, March 16, and then announce that it intended to purchase up to $700 billion of assets, it’s unclear how severe or catastrophic the near-term liquidity crisis may have become.

Safeguarding our investor community

As all of our investors are of course aware, it was shortly after this time that we chose to suspend the redemption programs to ensure that we were able to maintain sufficient cash reserves, as well as have the time necessary to determine how the effects of the pandemic might play out both within the portfolio and more broadly in the economy. Coupled with the modest leverage we had employed across the entirety of the portfolio, this decision meant that during a highly uncertain period, where panic selling was creating genuine concerns about liquidity in all markets, we were never at risk of having to consider selling any assets.

In addition, we also made the choice to reduce dividends over the second quarter based on the belief that rental income would decrease at most properties. In nearly every asset type, whether it be retail, office, or multifamily, tenants were quickly expressing concerns about their ability to pay their rents, and we concluded that holding back more cash would prove valuable both in terms of allowing us to be flexible landlords in the midst of a health crisis where millions of people were losing jobs, and also as an additional buffer to cover any operating shortfalls should they arise.

Together with the decision to suspend redemptions, these actions created what we believed was the closest thing to a fortress for our investors, positioning us to withstand the worst potential outcome that we could imagine.

An in-depth look at property level performance

As detailed in our stress test, more than 80% of the current Fundrise portfolio is invested in residential real estate assets (either as equity or debt), with approximately 50% of the entire portfolio held as equity or preferred equity investments in stabilized apartment properties.

Equity investments

First Half 2020 Table 1

These assets, which serve as the foundation of the portfolio, have proven (as we had anticipated) to be resilient in the face of such challenging circumstances. Our confidence in this asset type is driven by the belief that even in periods of economic distress where people are forced to cut back on discretionary spending, they still need a safe place to live, which creates a baseline level of demand, particularly for well-located and reasonably-priced apartments, a concept we’ve shared often in other discussions of our investment strategy.

This core thesis, into which we’ve invested over the past five years, has proven itself out yet again over the past few months, as both occupancy and rental income have more or less maintained themselves across the whole portfolio (with only a couple exceptions). In fact, despite the extent of the negative impact caused by the pandemic, on average, we’ve actually seen demand for our apartment properties increase during this time, driving continued growth in rental income, as more and more individuals choose to move to Sunbelt cities like Orlando, Jacksonville, Tampa, Charlotte, Dallas, or Nashville.

First Half 2020 Table 2

While it’s true that apartments generally have fared better than most other assets through this period, the Fundrise portfolio has actually performed better than many of the large publicly traded apartment REITs in several key areas. For example, rent collections, one of the primary measures of health at an apartment property, were approximately 93.9% at April and May month-end, ahead of the industry average of 93.3%6 reported by NAREIT, and close to the 94.6%7 reported by Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR), often considered to be a “blue chip” public apartment REIT8.

Additionally, unlike many public REITs, whose portfolios are concentrated in high-end apartments in gateway cities such as New York, Chicago, Boston, and San Francisco, our focus has almost exclusively been on reasonably-priced apartments in high-growth cities, from the Southeast through Texas to Los Angeles.

As a result, whereas the largest apartment REITs are now seeing rents falling as young knowledge workers decamp from these high-density, high-cost central business districts (-5.7% in San Francisco and -3.6% in Boston from March to June, according to CoStar), we’ve seen rent growth across the portfolio with the ten apartment communities purchased in 2019 achieving average rent growth (as measured by gross property income or GPR) of 5.88% from January through May 2020. This average is inclusive of the hardest-hit asset in the portfolio: the Class-A Las Vegas apartments acquired at the end of 2019.

Fixed-income investments

First Half 2020 Table 3

Preferred structure investments

The preferred equity investments that make up about 25% of the total portfolio (approximately $300 million across 48 properties) have seen some of the best returns of the entire real estate industry. As a reminder, these debt-like structured investments are generally senior to 15 – 25% of common equity, and so benefit from the contractually required 9 – 12% interest rates being largely insulated from external economic shocks to property operations.

At an average investment basis of $140,000 per unit, our portfolio of preferred equity investments in apartments is at a 25 – 50% discount to comparable public REIT NAVs9 (in other words we’re effectively investing at 25 – 50% less for a materially similar asset).

This ability to earn a relatively high return for a relatively low risk has not gone unnoticed, and of late, preferred equity has become the darling of institutional investors seeking new ways to deploy their capital. We expect that competition in this space will heat up over the next several months, making it more challenging to find new deals.

Senior construction or bridge loans

Of the remainder of the portfolio, close to 15% is senior debt, the large majority of which is, again, tied to residential assets and senior to 15 - 25% of common equity. All but three of our 31 loans are currently performing and paying their quarterly interest payments on time. For each of the three loans currently in default (representing 7.7% of the total senior debt portfolio), we’ve taken proactive steps to ensure that our position is well protected and we feel confident that we will end up recovering the principal invested.

Looking at the portfolio holistically

When looking at the portfolio in its entirety, of the limited instances (less than 4% total) where we have seen a material decline in asset performance (as defined by a change in property value of more than 5%), nearly all can be attributed to either the asset itself being a hotel (our single investment in a hotel, fortunately, is structured as preferred equity) or the location being within a market that is primarily hospitality-driven. In these few instances, we do expect that the heavy reliance on hospitality will hinder overall performance in the short-term but remain optimistic about the fundamental return prospects of these investments based upon both the relatively affordable basis at which we are invested and the long-term growth potential in the market once more normal operations are able to commence.

While we would all enjoy investing in a world without downturns or economic distress, we do not believe it’s realistic to make investments that are completely immune to any short-term challenges. So rather than deluding ourselves into chasing that which does not exist (carefree returns), we instead work to build a portfolio that can function as a resilient and self-sufficient ecosystem, capable of surviving even the darkest periods and succeeding over the long term.

To this point, of the 16 different funds that reported net asset value (NAV) this quarter (which together constitute approximately 92% of the total portfolio value), all but two produced either neutral or positive change in NAV, and only a single fund (the Heartland eREIT) experienced negative returns driven by the assets it holds, owing to it having the greatest exposure to the Las Vegas market. Despite the 30% unemployment in Las Vegas, the fund overall still only saw a net asset value change of -1.9%.

Understanding valuations and their impact on performance

As a reminder, the NAV is an estimated valuation of all the assets in our eREITs and eFunds, and adjustments generally occur on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. As we’ve discussed previously, such valuation methodology, although based upon actual historical performance and broadly available market projections, is ultimately an estimate of value. Therefore, any single quarter’s valuation is inherently representative of a range of values within which the asset is likely to fall.

It’s worthwhile to point out that because these valuations are based upon actual operations over the previous three to six month period, to a certain extent they are backward-looking. In other words, the second quarter NAV valuations are taking into consideration the effect that the pandemic has actually had on operations at each property from the end of March through June. This is then paired with our viewpoint as to what may occur at each property over the next few months and years, along with data projections from various third-party sources.

We also feel it’s important to highlight how this methodology for determining value compares to the stock market, which we would argue (at least in the short term) tends to be intrinsically driven by investor sentiment, with pricing based more on momentum than what is actually occurring in the real economy, for example, Hertz (NYSE: HTZ). As a result, whereas the stock market may swing wildly as sentiment changes, our valuation approach tends to be (by design) less prone to such volatility.

Ultimately, we believe that our investors are better served by this approach of taking conservative assumptions and not over-extrapolating what may end up being only short-term fluctuations in the assets (either positive or negative). While it may make monthly or quarterly returns less “exciting” than seeing 30%+ swings in value over 90 days, it should reward those investors who are genuinely intending to invest for the long term.

Looking ahead

We feel fortunate that some of our “worst possible outcome” scenarios from the pandemic, at least in regards to the economic fallout, have largely been avoided thus far. This observation is not intended to downplay the hardships that so many people have already experienced or will experience going forward. Rather, it’s an acknowledgment that regardless of one’s personal opinions on the federal government’s response to the economic crisis, we believe that the near-term effect of all the stimulus measures has been to calm markets; reducing fears about a lack of liquidity and creating an effective floor on asset prices.

Thankfully, we have not needed to draw on our cash reserves thus far, as the portfolio has not only maintained strong operations but has actually seen positive growth, both in terms of rental income as well as new dollars flowing in from our investor base. This does not, however, change our view on the necessity of the protective measures we put into place. We will happily err on the side of being habitually over-prepared rather than risk losing a property due to being caught off-guard even one time.

This also does not mean that we do not expect there to be additional periods of difficulty.

As any of our more seasoned investors are now well aware, we try to live by the advice of legendary value investors like Warren Buffett and Seth Klarman, perhaps best paraphrased by the words, “Take care of the downside, and the upside will take care of itself.”

And given how broadly and deeply this pandemic has disrupted our lives in such a short period of time, we have a hard time believing that some extended and unpredictable consequences will not manifest themselves in the coming months or years.

Still, we feel confident in the current position of the portfolio and, accordingly, have chosen to resume normal operations of the redemption programs (across all eREITs and eFunds) effective immediately, including processing all outstanding redemption requests in the funds that were on hold, with proceeds expected to be distributed over the next two to three business days. We are also exploring ways to continue to improve economies of scale and minimize operating costs, including a potential merger of the National and Los Angeles eFunds (we expect to have more updates on the eFunds over the next 60 days).

As discussed previously, we believe that the number of attractive opportunities for new investment will only continue to increase going forward, with the obvious caveat that the future is unpredictable and, as always, we can make no guarantees. However, if the economy can continue to improve on its current trajectory and the country can minimize the number of additional waves of the virus that are large enough to necessitate additional sweeping shutdowns, much of the recent positive momentum (which we were hesitant to incorporate into the forward-looking assumptions in the latest NAV updates) is likely to result in further value gains for the portfolio.

It’s also worth noting that per IRS regulations, our eREITs are required to distribute at least 90% of their taxable income each year, meaning that even though we’ve been conservative in our dividend declarations up to this point, to the extent that we have not met that 90% threshold as a result of holding back dividends, we may “catch up” on income distributions towards the end of the year.

Regardless, as the public markets seem destined to further disconnect from reality, we believe that (to an even greater extent than usual) the best opportunities to invest at good value will exist for those investors who are 1) able to access the private markets and 2) have had the patience and discipline to maintain strong defensive positions and the large cash reserves needed to capitalize on opportunities quickly. Together, we are well situated to do exactly that.

Onward,
The Fundrise Team